WebPEOPLE VS. REYES Criminal Suggest Category CONCEPCION, JR., J. SECOND DIVISION G.R. No. L-32557, October 23, 1981 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, VS. HON. ALFREDO C. REYES, AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT CRIMINAL COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND FRANCISCO ESTRELLA, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N … WebPeople vs Reyes Principle: The evidence applicable in this case is about Admissions and Confessions of a party. Sec. 26 of Rule 130 of the Rules of court provides: The act, declaration or omission of a party as to a relevant fact may be given against him. As to the Ruling in this case, the Court held Enough, however, may be
G.R. No. 199271, October 19, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES …
WebMonzon went to the place and talked to Rosauro Reyes and one Luis Buenaventura upon learning that the demonstration was not directed against the naval station but against … Web16. aug 2024 · After taking the statement of Noel de los Reyes, agent Arnel Garcia then took the statement of Randy Jocson who also waived his right to counsel; present at that time … chipping tempo
People v. De Los Reyes (G.R. No. 202435. August 16, 2024)
WebReyes v. People Jurisprudence Case number G.R. No. 232678 Division PH Supreme Court Third Division Date of decision Jul 3, 2024 Year of decision 2024 GBV Case Type Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children Act of 2004 (VAWC) Nature of the case WebPEOPLE v. MIZPAH R. REYES + DECISION 256 Phil. 1015 CORTES, J.: The crime of falsification of a public document carries with it an imposable penalty of prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods and a fine of not more than P5,000.00 [Art. 172, Revised Penal Code (RPC).] Webproperly attributed to Reyes as to rouse suspicion in the mind of the police officers that she had just committed, was committing or was about to commit a crime. The prosecution also failed to prove the conditions of Sec. 5 (b), Rule 113 since the arresting officer’s personal knowledge should have been based chipping technique golf